Yeah, I kind of wonder how much actual evidence there is behind any of that stuff.Humane Hominid wrote:I use none. Supplements are a scam, for the most part.
As far as I can tell, there's only just starting to be interest into a skeptical approach to those.
The only recommendations I've seen still involved pretty modest amounts of protein, which are easy to achieve with a diet rich in vegetables, legumes, and whole grains.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12380246
For an 80 kg person (around 180 lb), that's 136g of protein, max.The current recommended intakes of protein for strength and endurance athletes are 1.6 to 1.7 g/kg and 1.2 to 1.4 g/kg per day, respectively. Presently, most athletes consume an adequate amount of protein in their diet. The timing and nutritional content of the post-exercise meal, although often overlooked, are known to have synergistic effects on protein accretion after exercise. New evidence suggests that individuals engaging in strenuous activity consume a meal rich in amino acids and carbohydrate soon after the exercise bout or training session.
Supplements aren't necessary- although could still be convenient if you don't like to eat (but who wouldn't want to eat an extra meal each day?).
It makes sense that eating a larger volume of whole food, like vegetables that are rich in protein and other nutrients per calorie, would be the ideal way to go for nutrition. I can see being too busy for that, though, and reaching for a protein shake for the sake of convenience.