EquALLity wrote:RedAppleGp wrote:Well first of all that's not your milk, it was a baby calves'. He was the one that the milk was for, not humans.
Well if the calf doesn't get milk because of that, of course that's an issue. But I'm saying that use is not abuse; I'm saying it's not wrong to take the milk if no harm comes to the animals.
Well I'm not saying it's 100% immoral, but the cow didn't even get your permission to take iut's milk. It wasn't originally intended for you, it was intended frot he calf.
EquALLity wrote:RedAppleGP wrote:.Now this is juust me, but I find it weird that we take and drink milk that is from another species. If you ask me, that's kinda repellent.
Ok, but that doesn't make it
wrong.
I knew that wasn't exactly relevant, it was just me giving my 2 cents on drinking cow milk.
EquALLity wrote:RedAppleGP wrote:Not to mention that it does more harm than good.
I think you might be saying this because you're thinking of factory farming.
Well, most milk that is taken from cows
does come from factory farms.
There doesn't have to be harm done to milk a cow just because harm is typically involved with our farming today.
EquALLity wrote:RedAppleGP wrote:
But then you'd be the reason that the animal died. Can't really be justified..
What? Why?
The person who bought it would be in the wrong; he/she is the one actually causing suffering.
Well you were the reason that the animal had to die. An animal in a farm suffered, got slaughtered, which eventually ended up on your plate. Maybe not a direct cause, but still, you purchased an animal for consumption.
EquALLity wrote:So you think that if my friend is eating a chicken or something, and gets full and decides to throw away the leftovers, that it would be
unethical for me to eat the rest?
When it's all stripped down to the bare bones, I'd say yes. I mean seriously, you're eating the remains of what was once a sentient being. Just because you ate the remains doesn't cancel out the fact that you are eating the remains of an animal. but hey thats just me.