To advocate, or not to advocate.

Vegan message board for support on vegan related issues and questions.
Topics include philosophy, activism, effective altruism, plant-based nutrition, and diet advice/discussion whether high carb, low carb (eco atkins/vegan keto) or anything in between.
Meat eater vs. Vegan debate welcome, but please keep it within debate topics.
Post Reply
User avatar
bobo0100
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:41 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Australia, NT

To advocate, or not to advocate.

Post by bobo0100 »

I'm sure you've heared it before, "I'm fine with your choice to be vegan, but I don't think you should try to make others go vegan". this normaly happens when doing no more than making a youtube video, or talking with others about veganism. The will oftern continue by surgesting that advocating veganism is the same as advocating religion. I know the vegan athiest has made a video on this argument.
vegan: to exclude—as far as is practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for any purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and the environment.
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10332
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: To advocate, or not to advocate.

Post by brimstoneSalad »

"I'm fine with your choice to not own slaves, but I don't think you should try to make others free their slaves"

"I'm fine with your choice to not rape drunk women, but I don't think you should try to make others abstain from such rape"

"I'm fine with your choice to not smoke or binge drink while pregnant, but I don't think you should try to make other pregnant women abstain"

"I'm fine with your choice not to shoplift, but I don't think you should try to make others stop doing it"

"I'm fine with your choice not to molest children, but I don't think you should try to make others stop"

Almost nobody doing something immoral and harmful to others wants to be corrected, and they usually rationalize it to be a personal choice, because that's what makes them feel good. Try using an analogy.

If they decry your right to criticize their personal immoral actions, they lose the right to criticize others for doing things they disagree with- and if they do, they're hypocrites.
User avatar
TheVeganAtheist
Site Admin
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 9:39 am
Diet: Vegan
Location: Canada

Re: To advocate, or not to advocate.

Post by TheVeganAtheist »

I believe that advocacy is incredibly important. Most people have not wrestled with vegan issues before. They hold skewed notions of what it means, and they are fearful of what they do not understand. If you believe that veganism is correct, and has evidence supporting it, and you wish the world to be different then it currently is... advocacy is the logical conclusion.
Do you find the forum to be quiet and inactive?
- Do your part by engaging in new and old topics
- Don't wait for others to start NEW topics, post one yourself
- Invite family, friends or critics
Twizelby
Full Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 3:56 pm
Diet: Vegan

Re: To advocate, or not to advocate.

Post by Twizelby »

the only people that have gone vegetarian because of me asked me why I was vegan. I enjoy debates, I like hearing peoples thoughts, I like the challenge of it. I keep the debates that I have online. Every meal someone is probably going to see that I am eating unusual things and ask about it. Often people seem really curious why I'm vegan since I think (like many of us) I am not what they stereotype us to be. That being said most people start of defensive and mean even if they bring it up. It's not easy to be reminded that a sentient living being has to die for you to have a steak.
User avatar
bobo0100
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:41 pm
Diet: Vegan
Location: Australia, NT

Re: To advocate, or not to advocate.

Post by bobo0100 »

brimstoneSalad wrote:Try using an analogy.
I normaly do this, however, people will push back against it saying its difrent. So I ask why it's difrent. And to this I get two difrent answers.

1] "well, 2% of people are vegan." I don't understand the argument, my vote dosent count becouse I'm part of a minority. How white of them.

2] "that's difrent becouse they thought for people." To this I will ask for a rail ant criteria, not recive a rail vent criteria, and then show an example of a rail ant criteria.
vegan: to exclude—as far as is practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for any purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of humans, animals and the environment.
User avatar
brimstoneSalad
neither stone nor salad
Posts: 10332
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 am
Diet: Vegan

Re: To advocate, or not to advocate.

Post by brimstoneSalad »

Those are, respectively:

Bandwagon fallacy.
Speciesism.

The former is very easy to defeat, while the later requires some more discussion to explain to them how there's no fundamental difference between humans and non-human animals that makes others morally irrelevant.
Post Reply