Re: Thoughts on William Paley's Watchmaker analogy?
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:43 pm
I pooed and peed and shidded and farded
Edit: I camed in my pant
Edit: I camed in my pant
Philosophical Vegan Forum
https://831048.arinterhk.tech/
That refutation really falls short. With this you want to refute the Christian God, it does nothing for refuting there is God, so it is not effective. Everything came from somewhere, there was never just nothing, because everything can't come about if there was ever nothing, nothing could come from there being nothing. So what there was, always is, and this is necessary being. Being necessary this being is not limited in any way, so there is no division into a number, as this is artificial to necessary being, which always is, without limit. Anything like power, which must be there to make anything, is then unlimited. These things with all being unlimited is very much already like what we would call God.Not The Real JReg wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:40 am Hi, @Not The Real Jreg! Very interesting topic. Here are my thoughts:
A very good refutation of the watchmaker analogy can be found in the writings of David Hume, who in fact was not responding to Paley but to similar analogies before Paley had even developed his argument.
Hume observed that even if these arguments prove the universe was designed, there is no evidence from it that it was designed by the Christian God, as Paley claims it was. The designer does not have to be all-good, all-powerful or all-knowing. There may have been many designers, in fact.