Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 am
the person I recommended does, and is no longer a student, but a certified nutritionist.
A nutritionist is not a registered dietitian, and there are pseudoscience based schools of nutrition just as there are in medicine (naturopaths, chiropractors, functional medicine). That really tells you nothing. The fact that he's all about the microbiome suggests he's coming from one of the pseudoscience schools.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amotherwise please indicate where are these "victims" you speak about.
Anybody who has bought a test from him and been conned out of hard earned money.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amAs for the people whom he helped, those are easy to find.
You can also find people claiming to be helped by homeopathy even though it contains no active ingredients and it is impossible for it to have any effect beyond placebo.
If you want to stan for gojiman on anecdotes, that has a lot of implications for everything from homeopathy to christian science and faith healing.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amPerhaps best not to speak ill of people without knowing much about them?
I know he's promoting and profiting from pseudoscience, and in THIS context that's all I need to know.
He may be a good friend who helps you move flats and walks old ladies across the street, but in THIS sense he is a villain who is taking advantage of and profiting from desperate people, and even if it's not intentional and is based off delusions he has it's still harmful.
He's welcome to come here and argue the case for what he's doing not being pseudoscience, you've done a very poor job of making the argument if there is one.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amTesting the gut microbiome is not "pseudoscience", nor it is a blind approach
You understood nothing at all of what I said.
The tests may be legit in the sense that they'll tell you what microbes are in your feces and in what proportions, the problem is that data doesn't tell us anything that would help us make evidence based diagnoses and prescriptions. If it did, it would be mainstream medicine.
It's like if you were visually blind and I gave you a binary stream of a pixelated image of what's in front of you, technically you would have more information, but if you lack the knowledge or ability to interpret that information to prevent yourself from running into a wall then you are still blind.
That's what we're dealing with here with pro-testing pseudosciences like gojiman's microbiome stuff or the field of functional medicine.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amunlike taking drugs ad libitum to try to solve a problem
whose cause is clearly not being addressed.
YOU DON'T KNOW THE CAUSE.
It's unknown. And gojiman can't help you figure it out with his divining rod and tarot cards, no matter how many layers of scientific sounding jargon he piles on.
It's actually very likely that the medication will resolve the cause (as close to the root as possible) and can be weaned off of, but the OP should see a doctor to rule out anything more dangerous.
A lot of constipation is caused simply by loss of sensitivity. If somebody has a certain lifestyle or habit that leads to holding in stool, it can desensitize things down there and the problem can just get progressively worse and result in a large blockage around which small amounts of poop can leak.
That actually makes sense that the constipation originally went away after going vegan (because the fiber increased bulk and motility) but then came back again because the other lifestyle factors caught up again.
A few glycerine enemas can clear out the blockage, and a few months of laxative and regular enemas can allow sensitivity to return restoring normal bowel function after which the medication can be stopped.
In this case only addressing a root cause (like not going to the bathroom right away when you feel the urge) won't do anything because there's now a loss of sensitivity and blockage.
A specialist would likely tell the OP that much, but it's important that the OP rule out anything worse, even cancer.
Referring people to pseudoscience instead of evidence based medicine can delay treatment for life threatening conditions. You may very well be murdering people with your bad pseudoscience health advice.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amit's likely that some test can be taken for free, depending on the country, but some doctors might not be aware that such tests are useful, especially if you are hoping to get them from a GP.
Some countries will pay for all kinds of alt-med nonsense, doesn't mean it's credible.
Bernie Sanders' biggest accomplishment has been free pseudoscience for veterans. Just because idiot politicians decided it would be a good idea to pay for it doesn't mean it's based on evidence, and it doesn't mean it's not harmful.
If your doctor is "not aware" that those tests are useful, it's more likely that they simply are not useful, like how your doctor is also "not aware" of how garlic and lemon juice cure HIV -- because they
don't.
When and if more evidence becomes available to help us interpret these tests and offer evidence based treatment to correct microbiome problems, doctors will very quickly embrace and recommend it.
Again, the OP should probably go to a specialist (if it's affordable, anyway). They're not going to be behind on the science, but they will know enough not to waste your time and money on pseudoscience.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amThere is nothing dangerous in taking a stool test, or other non-invasive tests, and most people would certainly much rather do that, before going for a colonoscopy.
Failing to diagnose a life threatening disease is very dangerous. Even a delay in months pursuing other non-evidence-based options is a dangerous delay.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amIt's hard to find vegan nutritionists out there,
"Nutritionists" have no credibility.
It's not hard at all to find vegan friendly and pro-vegan
dietitians who don't have to be 100% vegan themselves to help you and respect your choices.
Amarillyde wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:50 amand it's simply ridiculous for you to trash professionists you evidently know nothing about,
I don't need to know everything about him to know enough when it comes to this topic.
The very idea that these tests are useful seems to be fundamentally ignorant of how evolution works, but that's another issue.
That said, this is getting off topic. If you want to keep arguing about microbiome stuff and whether it's pseudoscience or not you should probably start a new thread about it. And again, you're welcome to bring gojiman here to argue the case (in the new thread, I don't want to totally derail this one).