Corelich wrote:
What is debunked? That animals die because of agriculture? Don't think so. Sure its far less then animals get killed for animal based food but they still get killed.
The number is very low, and they are mostly killed by predators when the cover of the crops is removed and the mice, etc. are exposed (mostly by predatory birds).
Corelich wrote:
My guess is this number is far lower for range land cows.
Lower, maybe. The number is very low as it is. If you compare calorie to calorie (or gram of protein to gram of protein), you find fewer animals die in making vegan food.
And that is ignoring all of the greenhouse gas, contribution to global warming, and negative health effects from milk, eggs, and meat.
Corelich wrote:
I actually don't. But in an argument against somebody who drinks milk from cows who live on range land, he can claim that animals die from agriculture and thus drinking milk is not worse then eating soy.
Well, it's worse for your health and the environment. If you're only drinking milk, and not killing the cow, and not killing the calves, it's still not clear that fewer animals are killed, considering the number than the cow eats and steps on. These things are hard to track.
But it's not an argument for eating meat, or eating dairy, or even eating free-range grass fed no-kill dairy, because it's not a sustainable or viable alternative to vegetable food. Nobody actually drinks that kind of milk.